How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Topics and discussion geared towards lifestyle, personal finance/economics, and consumer affairs.
Post Reply
User avatar
5829
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:09 pm
Location: The Village
Contact:

How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by 5829 » Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:36 am

http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/06/22 ... grace-1-2/

Pulling plug on privacy
How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete
BY ALEX KOZINSKI AND STEPHANIE GRACE WEDNESDAY, JUNE 22, 2011

“We are gathered here today to mourn the loss of a dear friend, the Fourth Amendment. Born on the freedom-loving soil of early America, the Fourth Amendment will be remembered as the bulwark of the liberty we once called privacy. For ye, we mourn.”

As you can see, we’re working on a eulogy for the Fourth Amendment, the part of the Constitution guarding against “unreasonable searches and seizures” — in effect, a privacy provision.

When did the Fourth Amendment die, you ask?

Recently, but it’s been sick for a while.

So why haven’t you heard about it?

Because you’re the murderer. We all are. Our weapon of choice? Most recently, the smartphone, which, with our collective blessing, allows law enforcement to monitor our real-time geographic location. Although a bill recently proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., would require police to obtain a warrant before turning our cellphones into tracking devices, such legislation may come too late to save the Fourth Amendment from this fatal blow.

It started with the supermarket loyalty programs. They seemed innocuous enough — you just scribble down your name, number and address in exchange for a plastic card and a discount on Oreos. The problem, at least constitutionally speaking, is that the Fourth Amendment protects only what we reasonably expect to keep private. One facet of this rule, known as the third party doctrine, is that we don’t have reasonable expectations of privacy in things we’ve already revealed to other people or the public.

You would, for example, have a reasonable expectation of privacy for a photograph on your nightstand meaning the police would need probable cause and a warrant before taking a peek. But you lose that expectation of privacy when you tack the souvenir photo from Foamhenge on the office bulletin board to make co-workers envious.

Letting stores track our purchases may not appear to be permitting an intensely personal revelation but, as the saying goes, you are what you eat, and we inevitably reveal more than we thought. Have diapers in your cart? You probably have a baby. Tofu? Probably a vegetarian. A case of Muscatel a week? An alcoholic (with poor taste, at that). The cards also track the “where” and “when” of our shopping expeditions. Making a late-night run to a convenience store near your ex-girlfriend’s house? Buying posters and markers the day before a political rally? If you swiped your card, all that information is now public.

If you think police have turned a blind eye to this wealth of information, guess again. Without the protections of the Fourth Amendment, the police are free to mine the commercial databases storing our personal information without any suspicion whatsoever. Consider the case of Philip Scott Lyons in 2004: Police arrested the firefighter for arson after discovering he purchased a fire starter with his Safeway Club Card. The charges weren’t dropped until someone else confessed; not everyone will be so lucky.

These cards were just the beginning. Fast Track passes quickly followed — with their lure of a shorter commute for a little privacy. Then came eBay and Amazon, which save us from retyping our billing and shipping information, if only we create an account. Before long, convenience became paramount, and electronic tracking became the norm. Nowadays, Google not only collects data on what websites we visit but uses its satellites to take pictures of our homes. GPS manufacturer TomTom has collected — and disclosed to law enforcement — data on where people are speeding, so police could catch them in the act. Indeed, if Mexico’s highly anticipated experiment with iris scanners goes well, we may soon be going through airport security, making ATM withdrawals and buying groceries, quite literally, with the blink of an eye.

With so little left private, the Fourth Amendment is all but obsolete. Where police officers once needed a warrant to search your bookshelf for “Atlas Shrugged,” they can now simply ask Amazon.com if you bought it. Where police needed probable cause before seizing your day planner, they can now piece together your whereabouts from your purchases, cellphone data and car’s GPS. Someday soon we’ll realize that we’ve lost everything we once cherished as private. And as we grieve the loss of the Fourth Amendment, we’ll be forced to look deep in our hearts—and at the little pieces of plastic dangling from our keychains — and ask ourselves if it was all worth it. R.I.P.

Alex Kozinski is the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Stephanie Grace is his law clerk.
[center]~~~ accept everything - Believe Whatever - TRUST NOTHING ~~~~
Image
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Never tell all you know...[/center]
Disclaimer: The opinions are my own. Nobody else wants them.

User avatar
Über
392
Posts: 37880
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

Re: How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by Über » Wed Jun 29, 2011 6:56 am

Interesting, but everything evolves...Privacy will just come to mean something new, and ways to protect or enhance it will always pop up...Those that don't want to be tracked, for whatever reason, will still be able to avoid these things, and there are always going to be those guys who are smart enough to know how to blow smoke if need be...It would be difficult, but not impossible to digitally disappear...

User avatar
Fanatic
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:49 pm

Re: How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by Fanatic » Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:29 pm

Interesting read. Was aware of the phone info, but never considered shopping cards. It seems it would have to be EXTREMELY careful if you wanted to evade prying eyes.

User avatar
Über
392
Posts: 37880
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

Re: How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by Über » Wed Oct 10, 2012 6:42 pm

Good read and an aesthetic bump..!

User avatar
5829
Posts: 1565
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 11:09 pm
Location: The Village
Contact:

Re: How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by 5829 » Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:00 am

Fanatic wrote:Interesting read. Was aware of the phone info, but never considered shopping cards. It seems it would have to be EXTREMELY careful if you wanted to evade prying eyes.
There was an article that I read some odd time ago, not going to try and find it, about a recall (I think that it was food) and one supermarket notified the customers who used their store card to purchase that product.
[center]~~~ accept everything - Believe Whatever - TRUST NOTHING ~~~~
Image
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Never tell all you know...[/center]
Disclaimer: The opinions are my own. Nobody else wants them.

shin_dr
Posts: 1130
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:00 am

Re: How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by shin_dr » Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:14 pm

I think the behavior control/influence is as if not more worrying. Most of this are directing you to a particular product, with the side benefit of encouraging you to consume more.

BarryLen
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 8:15 pm

How technology helped make the 4th Amendment obsolete

Post by BarryLen » Sat Jul 06, 2019 3:59 pm

I have to agree with TLC, I dont see so many finished OHR games.

Maybe some people can tell us where we can play these games?

Post Reply