Page 2 of 2

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:31 pm
by x3n
I STILL don't get what the fuck the video was supposed to show...those frames have been all over the interweb for about 3 maybe 4 years now.

How about that video from the CITGO station nearby?...THAT's what I thought they were going to show, wishful thinking, I guess.



From CNN:
Judicial Watch is "a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law," according to its Web site.

The group filed a lawsuit this year, arguing that there was "no legal basis" for the government's refusal to release the tape.

The video requested by Judicial Watch was taken from security cameras at the Pentagon, the Sheraton National Hotel, the Nexcomm/Citgo gas station, and Virginia Department of Transportation traffic cameras.

Jill Farrell, Judicial Watch's director of media affairs, said she would not know which video will be released "until we see it."

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 8:50 pm
by emanon
does everyone think that the propaganda mill we call washington dc would release an authentic video that would even come close to supporting any of the conspiracy theories that are running rampant? From my perspective, any video that is released now would have to be heavily scrutinized by an objective 3rd party (does that exist in this case?) to be sure that the video being released is not just some hollywood special effects meant to divert the attention and scrutiny of the american public (like the moon landing footage but that is another discussion)

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:01 pm
by Bot



The new TFH, never leave the house without it! :alien:

Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 11:27 pm
by raum
the operable word is framerate.

no ground security camera is set up to capture at a framerate that would clearly identify any aerial attack.

best you will get are blurs unless you used a high quality DAT calibrated to do so, or physical tape recording at a 720 aperture or higher.