Re: Boy, 12, kills man who attacked his mom
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:13 am
My posts in VU are, in fact, views that were warranted. People encouraged those.
1. The Spear of Destiny post was in regards to the motion picture "Constantine" discussion i had with a few members of this forum. I was requested to post a bit about it, and did so. Most of these posts were recaps of personal conversations, and meant to be part of a knowledge base I WAS REQUESTED TO START.
This is the case with a good deal of those topics. I have studied alot of religious and esoteric topics that are often used (and abused) in the entertainment industry. Also most of them are DATED from at least like four revisions of this site ago about two years. I have previously mostly been active in the Entertainment category.
2. My views on sex are colored by the sacred nature of sex that make it more than using another person to get off. I have studied Tantra and Wu Tao Jing for over 12 years, and had formal training in both at least 10 years ago. I would consider a 3 minute sexual encouter to be "useless", because to me, sex is a form of meditation and reverance. I have made a personal choice that frowns upon the frantic sexual nature of the person who does not respect the power or effects of proper cultivation of the sexual force.
3. by demonstration, you failed to actually consider overt facts in articles before making debasing comments. You tend to weigh most posts I have seen with images that really convey little besides a questionable wit that is not your own. you have not refuted any contradictory statements to your own posts. I did think the correcting Buff on you not being american was clever, btw. and you have made a few quips that show me you are not thoughtless. but they are emeshed in so much vinegar there is little room for anything but refute. You might being sarcastic, if so, maybe you could put a <jk> tab, or something on your posts. Can't tell what tone of voice you are typing in, ya know?
By the way, my use of connasse is from my Cajun roots, not French. It is not gender specific, and it indicates a person who is acting like an ignorant ass, though they should know better. I do not know proper French well enough to communicate. In some circles back home, it is a term of affection or affiliation. I also use the term "ignorant" not as a general statement, but as to describe a lack of knowledge. I also use it in regards to myself with no compunction.
Also, you are aware the eXile is NOT a Russian paper. it is EXPAT satire. it is the very essence of Anti-American satire from the disillusioned expatriots in self-exile. You make no effort to mention that, and i am not sure if you are aware of it. You infer this is a russian sentiment. I will pick you up a copy next time I am at the Anarchist's Teahouse in the artists district of Philly, if you like.
I also never inferred Canadians cannot speak out against slavery. I just don't know how people can imagine the entire American Civil War was about slavery, or why so many people who speak against slavery have no knowledge of it and rely only on the notion that it was all the Confederacy was about. By reducing your reply to your images, you only demonstrate you don't get the point. MANY people in the Confederacy opposed human oppression.
I am not defending slavery. I am just quick to dispell the notion that all slaves were black, all southerners were slavers, or the Confederacy was the origin of slavery or was soley based on the rights to own human property. I do this, not to be pedantic nor to be defensive... it is to further the ideas that will fall into obscurity if they are not promoted.
Again, my point was to try and get you to speak about YOUR country and history. Did you not get that? If so, why was your response another pic of some Dixie idiot as if I would be offended?
1. The Spear of Destiny post was in regards to the motion picture "Constantine" discussion i had with a few members of this forum. I was requested to post a bit about it, and did so. Most of these posts were recaps of personal conversations, and meant to be part of a knowledge base I WAS REQUESTED TO START.
This is the case with a good deal of those topics. I have studied alot of religious and esoteric topics that are often used (and abused) in the entertainment industry. Also most of them are DATED from at least like four revisions of this site ago about two years. I have previously mostly been active in the Entertainment category.
2. My views on sex are colored by the sacred nature of sex that make it more than using another person to get off. I have studied Tantra and Wu Tao Jing for over 12 years, and had formal training in both at least 10 years ago. I would consider a 3 minute sexual encouter to be "useless", because to me, sex is a form of meditation and reverance. I have made a personal choice that frowns upon the frantic sexual nature of the person who does not respect the power or effects of proper cultivation of the sexual force.
3. by demonstration, you failed to actually consider overt facts in articles before making debasing comments. You tend to weigh most posts I have seen with images that really convey little besides a questionable wit that is not your own. you have not refuted any contradictory statements to your own posts. I did think the correcting Buff on you not being american was clever, btw. and you have made a few quips that show me you are not thoughtless. but they are emeshed in so much vinegar there is little room for anything but refute. You might being sarcastic, if so, maybe you could put a <jk> tab, or something on your posts. Can't tell what tone of voice you are typing in, ya know?
By the way, my use of connasse is from my Cajun roots, not French. It is not gender specific, and it indicates a person who is acting like an ignorant ass, though they should know better. I do not know proper French well enough to communicate. In some circles back home, it is a term of affection or affiliation. I also use the term "ignorant" not as a general statement, but as to describe a lack of knowledge. I also use it in regards to myself with no compunction.
Also, you are aware the eXile is NOT a Russian paper. it is EXPAT satire. it is the very essence of Anti-American satire from the disillusioned expatriots in self-exile. You make no effort to mention that, and i am not sure if you are aware of it. You infer this is a russian sentiment. I will pick you up a copy next time I am at the Anarchist's Teahouse in the artists district of Philly, if you like.
I also never inferred Canadians cannot speak out against slavery. I just don't know how people can imagine the entire American Civil War was about slavery, or why so many people who speak against slavery have no knowledge of it and rely only on the notion that it was all the Confederacy was about. By reducing your reply to your images, you only demonstrate you don't get the point. MANY people in the Confederacy opposed human oppression.
I am not defending slavery. I am just quick to dispell the notion that all slaves were black, all southerners were slavers, or the Confederacy was the origin of slavery or was soley based on the rights to own human property. I do this, not to be pedantic nor to be defensive... it is to further the ideas that will fall into obscurity if they are not promoted.
Again, my point was to try and get you to speak about YOUR country and history. Did you not get that? If so, why was your response another pic of some Dixie idiot as if I would be offended?
