Page 2 of 2
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:49 am
by WAY
heh, nice post Pete..!
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:47 pm
by Skinny Bastard
That was a little early, who.am.i ..... it hasn't been 6 months yet ..... /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 2:45 pm
by raum
hmm, I guess no one noticed my addition.
hint: [spoil:f7fa818e93]it's at the bottom[/spoil:f7fa818e93]
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 3:14 pm
by Pete
QUOTE(raum)hmm, I guess no one noticed my addition.
hint: [spoil:c13c5f360d]it's at the bottom[/spoil:c13c5f360d]
you bastard! :heat: :adp: :satan:
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 10:05 pm
by WAY
Sorta like my addition to the other thread..
Obviously BZA hasn't noticed yet, hehe
Oh, and Mr. SM, I was just being the "1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start
it all over again." /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:35 am
by deepdiver32073
QUOTE(teh1337357)
Depending on your theories/beliefs, world/universe eventually ends or something wipes out all life sometime in the future, thus ending the vicious cycle.
Then someone argues that although probability indicates that the end of the universe/world or total extinction is likely to happen at one point in time or another, nothing is saying it must and therefore it may never end, however likely it is.
That's assuming of course that the end of the universe would stop the arguement...