ADN

I'll ban anyone who objects, lol...

Aw, man... you think he'll be involved right away? :disappoint: I face Melo this week. (I doubt I'll lose in any given week, but I might bench the wrong starter and defeat myself; I'll have a less likelihood of that happening if my opponent does the same)

I'll send the invite to the other person on Monday

I suppose I'm playing him next week right?....sigh.... :|

So you want someone to take over, but not if it hurts your chances to win? Then what's the point of getting anyone to run the team? Whatever it takes to win I guess...

I don't want anyone to take over the team!...kidding..who would want to win that way?...ahem.. :liar:

erokero85 wrote:So you want someone to take over, but not if it hurts your chances to win? Then what's the point of getting anyone to run the team? Whatever it takes to win I guess...

No, I don't care, really, but I do feel kinda crummy for mentioning it last week, and it adversely caused the 'Belichickens' to lose. My bad. :roll:

In fact, there's a recent article on ESPN fantasy about absentee owners, and how to deal with them. See: http://sports.espn.go.com/fantasy/footb ... mish081014

Whenever the right time it is for another member to take over, and there is due notice to all those participating in the league, I think that is what was recommended.




P.S. I'm still confused. So nightbytes is back, and it was Mississippi Mental Patien who never checked in? And who the hell isn't annoyed out of there skull with the Cowpokes yet?

Hold on who are the Cowpokes?

Of Dallas. Romo, Phillips, Owens, Jones, Williams, Jones (another one), Checkdown, ESPN... I'm tired of these guys.

Oh yeah duh...sorry IO! Had a brain fart there, too much on the mind I thought you were referring to one of our fantasy teams. Yes I'm sick of the 'boys. But I've been sick of them my entire life. They're like the Yankees (no offense Ero & TT) they're always going to be the NFL's (thereby ESPN's) chief focus.