Page 3 of 5

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:18 am
by Buffmaster
N.Korea seeks talks with U.S. over missile

Same old song and dance

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 8:55 am
by Brains
will the US? no clue.


should the US? hell no!

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:45 pm
by Buffmaster
Brains, Thank you for your professional opinion.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:01 pm
by Bot
QUOTE(Buffmaster)If we do, it's considered an Act of War.

And that's why they won't. Whether North Korea is actually dumb enough to launch it, I don't know. But there won't be an American missile.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:48 pm
by trashtalkr
It might be considered as a preemptive strike by N Korea though. You know how our government views preemptive strikes

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:59 pm
by Bot
Yes, but we're not talking about Iraq here. North Korea is a more formidable opponent. The situation has to be approached with caution.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:02 pm
by trashtalkr
Yea that's true but I still don't think the US will let the missle get off the ground. If it does it off the ground I don't think it'll last very long

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:10 pm
by Bot
I really don't think the U.S. will shoot it down. I'm not even sure if North Korea will fire the damn thing. lol This tells you how sad the situation is:

"North Korea said Wednesday it wants direct talks with the United States over its apparent plans to test-fire a long-range missile, but a top U.S. envoy rejected the request."

They've been asking for direct talks with the U.S. for the last few years. This, to me, just seems like a ploy to get the U.S. to agree.

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:14 pm
by Brains
kramer: "Great! Let's ban all communication. Dialogue leads to nothing. Rrrrrrezzzzolve does." Correct?

tt: your gov likes pre-emptive strikes a lot! so we obviously should allow Korea to, no? or are we talking double standards... again?

@all: how many missiles did the US test the last year? how many war machines? 5? 10? 20?

we have:
- a US Military FCT contract for High Speed Amphibians
- U.S. Combat Vehicles to get enhanced vision
- a B-1 Bomber Radar upgrade
- a Super Hornet demonstrating network capability in multiple JDAM drop
- an Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System II (APKWS II)
- an ULTRA AP (Armored Patrol) Military Combat Vehicle Concept
- met the SLAM-ER
- The world's most lethal six-shot revolver
- the Howitzer M777
- Thermobaric weapons
- the Low-Cost Autonomous Attack System (LOCASS)

we might even have:
- Kelly the Dolphin: armed and dangerous? (which would outrage WWF)

and the West is nagging about a stupid, traditional, archaic, ballistic, long-range missile. God, we are full of ourselves!

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:26 pm
by Bot
QUOTE(Brains)kramer: "Great! Let's ban all communication. Dialogue leads to nothing. Rrrrrrezzzzolve does." Correct?

So, how stupid are you? /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />