Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 3:20 pm
lmao.
pacifist people are the reason there will never be peace in the Middle East?! lol. I fully see the logic in your post bm. You need bombs; illegal and unilaterally decided, mini-coalition led wars based on false pretexts. You need to support nations which are violating internationally agreed upon conventions continuously and veto sanctions against them. Then again, sometimes, you do NOT need to support nations which are violating internationally agreed upon conventions and SUPPORT sanctions against them. (easy to decide when to do what, you just need to ask the question: "what is in OUR interest here?"). And then to finish with, you start violating your own laws as well as these internationally agreed upon conventions and tell the public that these violations are needed because of a war which should not really be violent to go somewhere.
it is so damn funny to hear you all go against me and take cheap shots all of the time - as a group. While you do not have a clue about what I actually think. I do not blame the US for all the world's problems; yet at the same time I am convinced that the currect US administration is only worsening the world's problems with their "war on terror".
Never has there been so many dispersed terror threats than now. And you guys are convinced the "war on terror" is being waged well?! I agree we need to address the problem and I have since 9/11, I am not agreeing with the WAY it is addressed. Do note I use "address" and not "war".
bring on the flames chaps - knowing from experience that you are not able to defend your position without resorting to that tactic.
pacifist people are the reason there will never be peace in the Middle East?! lol. I fully see the logic in your post bm. You need bombs; illegal and unilaterally decided, mini-coalition led wars based on false pretexts. You need to support nations which are violating internationally agreed upon conventions continuously and veto sanctions against them. Then again, sometimes, you do NOT need to support nations which are violating internationally agreed upon conventions and SUPPORT sanctions against them. (easy to decide when to do what, you just need to ask the question: "what is in OUR interest here?"). And then to finish with, you start violating your own laws as well as these internationally agreed upon conventions and tell the public that these violations are needed because of a war which should not really be violent to go somewhere.
it is so damn funny to hear you all go against me and take cheap shots all of the time - as a group. While you do not have a clue about what I actually think. I do not blame the US for all the world's problems; yet at the same time I am convinced that the currect US administration is only worsening the world's problems with their "war on terror".
Never has there been so many dispersed terror threats than now. And you guys are convinced the "war on terror" is being waged well?! I agree we need to address the problem and I have since 9/11, I am not agreeing with the WAY it is addressed. Do note I use "address" and not "war".
bring on the flames chaps - knowing from experience that you are not able to defend your position without resorting to that tactic.