Page 3 of 4
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 5:56 am
by AYHJA
No...
Not IE vs Firefox...
That shit ain't even close, lol...
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:14 am
by gmsnctry
Hehe
Unfortunately I stick with what I know- and some of my clients demand MS crap so IE it is
MS Stock was too high I woulda bought that too - alas 5 kids makes that all (im)possible
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:09 am
by AYHJA
I will admit, however, with the advent of IE 7, I haven't installed any IE replacements...Its good enough for temp usage IMO...
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 4:00 am
by AYHJA
AMD is cutting jobs, Intel is cutting prices...Quad core CPU's for less than $250 in July...
http://tinyurl.com/2mu97s
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 6:17 am
by WAY
Quad Core Intel ~= Dual Core Intel
Re: The Official Intel vs AMD Thread
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:01 am
by AYHJA
Intel Core2 Extreme QX6850
Need....Need I say more..?
Re: The Official Intel vs AMD Thread
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:13 am
by AYHJA
"Penryn" Benchmarks Hit The Web
http://snipurl.com/1pdae
Re: The Official Intel vs AMD Thread
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:21 pm
by BlindG
Intel is still daydreaming ...
On, an you intel fanboy, Mr AYHJA, please remember that the only reason intel is ahead now is because AMD was sitting too much on its arse after the 939 release :p
MEANING, that if AMD puts in the work, intel will just be another brick in the wall of slowness :p
:twisted:
Re: The Official Intel vs AMD Thread
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:32 pm
by AYHJA
If you are still coming up for excuses for AMD, then it is you that is the fanboy, not me...Hips don't lie, and neither do the numbers... :)
Re: The Official Intel vs AMD Thread
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 9:32 am
by WAY
AMD's new CPUs due out very soon now..
But in the meantime:
http://www.hothardware.com/News/AMDs_Back_in_Black/
And Uber, yes, numbers don't lie, but that's not to say they can't be manipulated. :)