Kumicho wrote:And why not..?
A question I posed in another thread has still gone unanswered...Feel free to include bullshit or propaganda, but give me a single reason why I would even consider voting for a McCain Palin ticket...
Because NOTHING Obama ever did was on budget, on time, and successful. His promises are socialist promises. You ever see what happens when Socialists get in power? I think he is a good idealist, and HONESTLY think in four years he would be grounded enough to run. Not yet; he still bears FAR too much of the Socialism that inspired him to be a politician and he is riding a wave of activism that is full of so much corruption. i don't hate the idea of Socialism, just the reality that it will NEVER work.
For example...Barak Obama's tax plan says that it will give me 8x's much of a tax break than John McCain's...Barak Obama has 2 young girls, one of them is the same age as my own son...His concerns as a father a likely to be closer to mine...Barak Obama is extremely intelligent, articulate, and pretty clean for a politician...About the most critical decision of our lifetime, the war, Barak Obama was the only one to stand up and say no...
This is a plan that was devised by the geniuses behind the FNMA issue that is being used as a smoke screen now. And he did not "stand up and say no...
HE WASN'T IN CONGRESS FOR THE VOTE! Damn, stop treating this like some type of "he was the only one" bullshit. Obama is not the Golden Child. He was chosen to achieve a socialist agenda. In CONTRAST, Ron Paul DID vote no on the war in Iraq, and he wasn't the only one.
He is a mediocre politician at best riding a wave of hype for people you have probably never heard of. He probably is intelligent about some things, but is a poor judge of character and had BAD business sense. He was chosen by Carl Davidson to head Bill Ayer's board, which squandered 54 million dollars in grants - and showed no economic progress as it promoted leftist ideals. That misuse of grants was his strongest qualification for Senate, except his "meet-n-greet' at Ayer's home, where Ayers announced he was to be Alice Palmer's successor. Then, he joined The New Party for some election fusion magic and ended up in State Senate. He *might* have abandoned the more extreme of those ideas, but it is too risky to guess.
Just a few reasons similar to those, to help those here if nowhere else, see why you don't see McCain the way we do...
[/quote]
I don't give a damn who you vote for; but I DISPISE delusion. Do the math...
Of the 50 major legislative bills sent to President Bush since January 2005 when Obama came to Congress, neither has voted with Bush. The president doesn't VOTE, he signs into bills proposed and voted on by Congress, or vetoes them if he chooses:
Sen. Obama supported legislation signed by President Bush 19 times.
Sen. McCain supported legislation signed by President Bush 17 times.
Obama voted along party lines 97% of the time. what does that tell you?
THESE ARE ALL VOTING AND ON Liberal DEMOCRATIC Legislative tenets. EVEN BUSH.
Ironic that obama protrays McCain as most consistently voting with Bush, since his entry in congress in 2005 OBAMA has been most in line with bush... and McCain has avoided more votes than Barack. It is a classic case of being the bastard you accuse others of being. Typical Fascist smear tactic. WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!
*edited to fix quote tags*