Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:04 pm
Now....let's actually read the threads.......I have never said that Reggie Bush is untalented....... so let's see how many times you decided to make that my arguement in your reply ...
Which one of us jumped up and said RB would be the best player in football next year, even if he doesn't have a decent team..?
I didn't say anything about my point until Aemeth went and said he'd be top 5 of all time.....so...theres your answer to that question.
"Well, the Pac-10 sucks, and lets see what he does against Texas," and shit, like on that day, football will cease to be a team sport...
Football has ceased to be a team sport ever since Reggie Bush stepped on the field for most folks. No one is giving any credit to USC's offensive line for any of RB's success....nor the fact that they have a great pasing attack....or the fact that they're flat out the best in college football....so he is already put in an excellant position to succeed. He is doing more than his share, and I realize that...but damn...Reggie Bush isn't the reason USC has gone undefeated...he may be part of it....but Matt Lienart was up for Heisman again too...and regardless of what people might think...I've heard that RB still might not even go number 1....
Imagine the dude laying in the cut saying that LT could not be great, or doesn't have the potential to be great, because he played his college ball in a stank confrence...TCU played Oklahoma and got steam rolled...Nobody was saying LT wasn't the real deal then
Have I ever said that Reggie Bush is going to suck.....or that Reggie Bush doesn't have potential?...No actually I've said the oppisite many times...you just refuse to believe that...and continue to pump out stats and other examples to refute the fact that I think RB is bad....when I dont.
Seriously whats the point of giving me stats of running back's in college.....? How does that refute my statement, regardless of how stupid you think that statement is.
In fact...this argument wouldn't even be going on if you actually read the first time.......Aemeth says he thinks RB will be top 5 of all time...I say how the fuck can you say that when he's not even played an NFL game....the man has the tools but let's wait and see what he does with it....... then I get two people jumping on my back and telling me "Reggie Bush is the complete package!" .... well thank you, I can hear that anytime I turn on the TV....
Since when does me trying to hold back an opinion and wait for further analytical oppurtunity to give my full thoughts on him....turn me into the bad guy?
I think it's stupid to say he's top 5 of all time based on statistics from college. and now I'm horrible? WTF? You guys have dragged this one single point on into 5 replies because you guys aren't reading it right.
You jazz on about the lack of competition in the Pac-10, where were you when he torched Notre Dame (A BCS tean) for 160 yards averaging 10 yards a carry..?
Where were you when Notre Dame (A BCS team) got fucking crushed by Ohio State because they lack the team speed to catch up? Let me give you a little run-down of how thye got scored on.... Ted Guinn 56 yard TD pass...... Ted Guinn 68 yard TD run....Santonio Holmes 85 yard TD pass.....Antonio Pittman 60 yard TD run........ Notre Dame got exposed...the only reason they had such a good record was because they only played I believe 2 teams with a winning record all season....and it sure does help coming out of the Pac10... So before you jazz up ND and how they provide great compeition...watch the bowls...
You need to ask yourself why you feel the need to say petty little shit like that... because unlike everyone else I'm not willing to put my foot in my mouth over stupid predictions about something that is unknown.....and in fact...if RB gets to the NFL and succeds....I won't look stupid...because I've never said he wont do well....I just said that theresn o way of knowing.....telling me thats a stupid thing to say...could have been settled 8 posts ago...you've stretched this out for I dont know why.....I said RB is good and is doing his thing...and I said that He has all the tools to succeed in the NFL....but don't tell me that theres never been anyone who's looked great and then flopped....and now you're just gonna go on and post more stats telling me how RB is good.....when I've stated that a million times now...
::throws up hands and breathes:: I 'm so sick of this pointless thread by now....we both think hes good......you say he'll be amazing in the NFL...I say lets wait and see..
I never knew that'd turn into some huge blown out of porportion argument...
Which one of us jumped up and said RB would be the best player in football next year, even if he doesn't have a decent team..?
I didn't say anything about my point until Aemeth went and said he'd be top 5 of all time.....so...theres your answer to that question.
"Well, the Pac-10 sucks, and lets see what he does against Texas," and shit, like on that day, football will cease to be a team sport...
Football has ceased to be a team sport ever since Reggie Bush stepped on the field for most folks. No one is giving any credit to USC's offensive line for any of RB's success....nor the fact that they have a great pasing attack....or the fact that they're flat out the best in college football....so he is already put in an excellant position to succeed. He is doing more than his share, and I realize that...but damn...Reggie Bush isn't the reason USC has gone undefeated...he may be part of it....but Matt Lienart was up for Heisman again too...and regardless of what people might think...I've heard that RB still might not even go number 1....
Imagine the dude laying in the cut saying that LT could not be great, or doesn't have the potential to be great, because he played his college ball in a stank confrence...TCU played Oklahoma and got steam rolled...Nobody was saying LT wasn't the real deal then
Have I ever said that Reggie Bush is going to suck.....or that Reggie Bush doesn't have potential?...No actually I've said the oppisite many times...you just refuse to believe that...and continue to pump out stats and other examples to refute the fact that I think RB is bad....when I dont.
Seriously whats the point of giving me stats of running back's in college.....? How does that refute my statement, regardless of how stupid you think that statement is.
In fact...this argument wouldn't even be going on if you actually read the first time.......Aemeth says he thinks RB will be top 5 of all time...I say how the fuck can you say that when he's not even played an NFL game....the man has the tools but let's wait and see what he does with it....... then I get two people jumping on my back and telling me "Reggie Bush is the complete package!" .... well thank you, I can hear that anytime I turn on the TV....
Since when does me trying to hold back an opinion and wait for further analytical oppurtunity to give my full thoughts on him....turn me into the bad guy?
I think it's stupid to say he's top 5 of all time based on statistics from college. and now I'm horrible? WTF? You guys have dragged this one single point on into 5 replies because you guys aren't reading it right.
You jazz on about the lack of competition in the Pac-10, where were you when he torched Notre Dame (A BCS tean) for 160 yards averaging 10 yards a carry..?
Where were you when Notre Dame (A BCS team) got fucking crushed by Ohio State because they lack the team speed to catch up? Let me give you a little run-down of how thye got scored on.... Ted Guinn 56 yard TD pass...... Ted Guinn 68 yard TD run....Santonio Holmes 85 yard TD pass.....Antonio Pittman 60 yard TD run........ Notre Dame got exposed...the only reason they had such a good record was because they only played I believe 2 teams with a winning record all season....and it sure does help coming out of the Pac10... So before you jazz up ND and how they provide great compeition...watch the bowls...
You need to ask yourself why you feel the need to say petty little shit like that... because unlike everyone else I'm not willing to put my foot in my mouth over stupid predictions about something that is unknown.....and in fact...if RB gets to the NFL and succeds....I won't look stupid...because I've never said he wont do well....I just said that theresn o way of knowing.....telling me thats a stupid thing to say...could have been settled 8 posts ago...you've stretched this out for I dont know why.....I said RB is good and is doing his thing...and I said that He has all the tools to succeed in the NFL....but don't tell me that theres never been anyone who's looked great and then flopped....and now you're just gonna go on and post more stats telling me how RB is good.....when I've stated that a million times now...
::throws up hands and breathes:: I 'm so sick of this pointless thread by now....we both think hes good......you say he'll be amazing in the NFL...I say lets wait and see..
I never knew that'd turn into some huge blown out of porportion argument...