Page 5 of 5

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 8:56 pm
by raum
i don't care if they had them at the time.

that was not my reasoning for going in, EVER.

the truth is what Saddam did BACK IN THE NINETIES has no STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. It is a crime you can forever be persecuted for.

There was a UN resolution at the time, backing the attack of Iraq, under Clinton, following attacks I witnessed.

As senior permanent members of the UN council, we had EVERY right to pursue him.

Clinton backed down,.. and we have been trying to recover from that for some time.

because that was just as bad as when Jimmy Carter gave the panama canal away, and when he gave a happy ending to the Iranians who led to the fuster cluck that screwed up the REAL democratic party, and neutered the American Resolve.

Brains, how many times have you witnessed Genocide? what you saw of Rwanda was nothing compare to those of us who got vaccinations and were hours from landfall before we were pulled back. I lost family members to genocide.

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:53 pm
by Bot
Yeah, I'll be honest... I didn't care if Iraq had WMD. I was just glad we were finally going in. I was tired of fucking around with Iraq.

Al-Qaida chief hails al-Zarqawi as hero, martyr

Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:48 pm
by Buffmaster
Leader of al-Qaida in Iraq was killed after U.S. bombing of hideout


One down, two to go