Page 1 of 1

Intel Core 2 Scorches

Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 2:21 pm
by AYHJA
I have little doubt in my mind which chip I'll next get...Sorry AMD..! Intel has amped up the performance, and not the price...

http://www.webwereld.nl/articles/42006/ ... tests.html

Related Links:
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/07/14/core_ ... k_results/

Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:32 pm
by WAY
lol, yup..
Read this last week when I launched..
For the time being, I would seriously consider purchasing one of these Intels. However, from /.'s front page of today:QUOTEDigitalDame2 writes to mention a PC Magazine article about the AMD 4x4 enthusiast platform, which is meant to counter Core 2 Duo. The article observes that AMD is now facing many of the same business practices it used in its war against Intel. From the article: "While imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, improvement can often be a slap in the face. Intel's C2D was designed with both low power and performance per watt in mind, two key design metrics that helped AMD cut into Intel's market share with the Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 X2. And, as preliminary numbers have indicated and final performance reviews now show, the C2D has learned its lesson well: its performance now tops AMD's Athlon 64 architecture by a substantial margin."

The original article also mentions AMD's plans for rolling out the 8x8 platform by 2007:
QUOTEAn eight-core "8X8" program will roll out in 2007, executives said, most likely based on two physical processors containing four virtual processor cores.

Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:34 am
by zaphodz
Great stuff. Competition like this is fantastic. Intel has been behind for some time.

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:17 pm
by AYHJA
Here's a FULL review of the Quad core Kentsfield:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... spx?i=2866

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:45 pm
by WAY
QUOTEAnd what about AMD? As expected, 2006 has turned out to be Intel's comeback year, and it won't be until the introduction of Barcelona in the middle of 2007 until we really see a performance competitive AMD. Of course AMD's 4x4 has yet to launch, and while it will be a monstrous platform, it will be even more of a niche product than Intel's $999 Kentsfield. While Kentsfield will work in many currently shipping Core 2 motherboards, 4x4 is an entirely new platform using Socket-1207 (not AM2) CPUs. As much as AMD wants 4x4 to succeed, what we're really waiting for is Barcelona.

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2006 2:06 pm
by jdog
QUOTE(AYHJA @ Nov 3 2006, 11:17 AM) Here's a FULL review of the Quad core Kentsfield:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/sh ... spx?i=2866

$850 for the cheapest one...a little beyond my price range ATM. I'll still with my dually Opteron 165 until it becomes "slow".

Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:24 am
by AYHJA
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700 CPU Quad Core Review

http://www.mvktech.net/content/view/3511/39/

Bye bye AMD..!

Article Summary

Pros:

* Excellent Performance
* Quad Core Technology
* Multi-Threading Performance
* Unlocked Multiplier
* Outstanding Functionality
* Amazing Overclocking Capability
* Future Proof Technology
* Power Consumption

Cons:

Quite Expensive

Leap ahead indeed..