ADN

Dozens of Taliban killed in Afghan battle

Now this is how you get the fucking job done! lol 'Bout 72 dead insurgents, 0 dead Coalition troops.

That's what I'm talking about. I'm sure Brains will say that they were murdered or something to that effect.

LoL...where is my man Brains anyway..?

kramer: the six afghan policemen don't count for you? hmm. interesting.

bm: i regret any loss of life, so yes, I condemn the invasion of Afghanistan as well. violence just does not solve anything in the long run. the taliban is getting more powerful again lately, which I am not happy for, since they are extremists. but well, you can easily argue we are as well: bombing countries back to the stone age in "pre-emptive strikes" based on loose intelligence.

ayhja: here. I was on holidays the first two weeks of August. sipping on gin and juice in portugal - kinda. /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />

Thats dozens of Taliban we don't have to worry about. Been there and done that... I will hold back my comment because it may piss on someones parade, but some of you may know my feelings about Taliban and the other cowards over there.

6 soldiers killed elsewhere

And I can't read? :roll:

QUOTE(Kramer)6 soldiers killed elsewhere

And I can't read?  :roll:
apparently you can't, because I was not even referring to these. :roll:

the article mentions: "However, seven Afghan policemen were reported killed in the clashes." (seven, not six. I got a reading problem as well, but not as profound as yours. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" /> )

As long as they kill themselves and leave us alone, they could live forever or die today, and I don't give a shit which.

QUOTE(Brains)QUOTE(Kramer)6 soldiers killed elsewhere

And I can't read?  :roll:
apparently you can't, because I was not even referring to these. :roll:

the article mentions: "However, seven Afghan policemen were reported killed in the clashes." (seven, not six. I got a reading problem as well, but not as profound as yours. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" /> )

Actually asshat, they updated the article. When it was first published, there was no mention of 7 dead Afghan police offices. You said 6, so I assumed you were referring to the 6 that were killed elsewhere.

Even still, 72-7 is still pretty good.

10-1 is a good split. I'll give Kramer a 10-1 odd on kicking Brain in the nuts and winning the fight.