I could care less about racing games, and first person shooters. The only thing I saw for PS3 that looked like I must have it is Assassin's Creed, and now that is coming to the 360 as well, and UBI demos of the game at XO6 were on the 360, so it is ready and being tested.
i think heavenly sword might be interesting, but doesn't look to have much new. new graphics, same story.
Assassin's Creed is like Grand Theft Jerusalem, and so much more. intuitive controls, for hands and feet, climb anything that sticks out more than 2 inches, that is unparalleled freedom of movement. Also, the crowd goes apeshit when you kill someone, and will either help you escape (if you are working for common good) or help make your capture (if you are not). you can form allegiences, you can make personal enemies.
the people who made the Prince of Persia games had something special, and they are the masterminds behind this. So expect twists...
For one, the Grand Theft Jerusalem part of it is actually a scan of your genetic memory, in this trilogy of games.
I look at heavenly sword, and I see God of War, and I thought GOW was better. and in fact, most critics who have seen the insides of the game agree, and thus just call it Goddess of War.
Metal Storm, stupid name, at least a race game with some interest.
Lair just doesn't look right, the dragons look weird to me, no neck?
i will give Blue Dragon a look as a RPG, because dragons are undeniably cool, and also for my real time dragon fix, Eragon will be out before Christmas on the 360 in conjuction with the movie, and playing Sephira (the dragon in the book) will be awesome, and it is confirmed on some stages you play Seph, and there will be tons of replayability for hidden content.
http://xboxmovies.teamxbox.com/xbox-360 ... S-Trailer/
may not look as clear as lair, but looks more than fun enough for me to at least give it a shot. besides, GREAT STORY!!
PS3 just doesn't seem to offer anything new to a person who has a 360, except a tilt axis controller most of us don't want. (and MS is working on a more joytick based version of this) and a 1080p resolution most homes can't support, yourself included.
besides xbox 360 gets 1080p update this spring, and I CAN USE support it!
but lemme get this straight, you are saying the PS3 is better, even though you can't afford one, and can't even support the superior resolution if you could?
so, clearly in terms of which is better, you are not answering the question of which is better for YOU, when, as a consumer, that is exactly the most important selling point for me. And as far as i can tell, the CELL processor is nto all its cracked up to be in terms of technical advantage.
and the next is is the PS3 worth the additional 300 dollars, and that is a HUGE "no way jose."
Not when such great games as Fable2, Crackdown, Vampire's Rain, Rainbow Six Vegas, Marvel Ultimates, exclusive GTA4 playable content, and PETER JACKSON games are coming out on a system I already own. as it is, if I hadn't the trade in credit, I wouldn't have a xbox live until Fable2 comes out... but I figured what the hey, it was less than 60 bucks, which is what most people pay for a game!