ADN

Your browser doesn't support IFRAMEs. Either upgrade or miss out on the content! By order of who.am.i

Link:
http://www.miniature-earth.com

not impressed by the socialist "why doesn't everyone just share equally" mentality. In a world of 100 people, you would deal with a different social dynamic all together, and you would not have 50/50 divisions of gender, to say the least. And most of the complex resource drains would be much more manageable.

It is from overpopulation that we have faced most of the blights on humanity today. but also some of our greatest advances.

In a world of 100 people, there would not be proportionate variances in human conditions or thought patterns. Too many factors are left out of this "project" (which as far as I can tell involved playing the same note on a big instrument, while multiplying per capita stats in your general world almanac by 100, and showing stock photography and a couple of standard animation options in some media developement software.

i want my click back, this link wasn't worth it...

i think what they tried to do instead of telling you percentages, "make you feel" one in 100 ... mathematically speaking in a 100 people world neither of us would reach to be 5/3 e-7 of a person

5/3 e-7 ?????
Did you mean:
((5e)/3)-7 or
(5/3)e-7 or
(5/3)(e-7) or
(5/3e)-7 or
5/(3e-7) or
5/(3(e-7)) or
0.00000016666666666667 mathmatically speaking.

i want my click back...haha

QUOTE(raum @ Oct 26 2006, 10:11 AM) i want my click back, this link wasn't worth it...