Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 7:34 pm
GEMA obtains injunctions against data exchange services
The German collecting society GEMA has obtained from the District
Court in Cologne temporary injunctions against the operator of the
data exchange services www.rapidshare.de and www.rapidshare.com. The
latter is said to have used copyright protected works of GEMA members
in an unlawful fashion. The services make virtual storage space
available into which users can upload content that is thereby made
publicly available to other users. GEMA spokesman Hans-Herwig Geyer
told heise online that the services should not be allowed to continue
to operate in their present form. The collecting society is now
demanding that the operator provide details on how many copyright
protected works of GEMA members are currently stored on the said sites.
According to GEMA, the service www.rapidshare.de in particular has at
times boasted of making some 15 million files available to its users.
The operator had however failed to obtain from GEMA a license for
making copyright protected files available, the collecting society
spokesman observed. To date RapidShare had claimed not to have any
knowledge of the content uploaded by the users and of not being in a
position to control the same, the spokesman continued. Through its
injunctions the District Court in Cologne had now however made it
clear to the company that the fact that it was the users and not the
operator of the services that uploaded the content onto the sites did
not, from a legal point of view, lessen the operator¢€™s liability for
copyright infringements that occurred within the context of the
services, the spokesman added.
Harald Heker, the chairman of the executive board of GEMA, believes
the court's decisions will have repercussions on the way "Web 2.0
services" such as YouTube and MySpace will be treated in future. What
the decisions according to Mr. Heker show is that "the mere
circumstance of shifting acts of use to users and the purported
inability of the operator to control content do not relieve the
operator of a service from the copyright liability he/she/it possesses
for the content made available for download from the operator's
website(s)." (Robert W. Smith) / (anw/c't)
The German collecting society GEMA has obtained from the District
Court in Cologne temporary injunctions against the operator of the
data exchange services www.rapidshare.de and www.rapidshare.com. The
latter is said to have used copyright protected works of GEMA members
in an unlawful fashion. The services make virtual storage space
available into which users can upload content that is thereby made
publicly available to other users. GEMA spokesman Hans-Herwig Geyer
told heise online that the services should not be allowed to continue
to operate in their present form. The collecting society is now
demanding that the operator provide details on how many copyright
protected works of GEMA members are currently stored on the said sites.
According to GEMA, the service www.rapidshare.de in particular has at
times boasted of making some 15 million files available to its users.
The operator had however failed to obtain from GEMA a license for
making copyright protected files available, the collecting society
spokesman observed. To date RapidShare had claimed not to have any
knowledge of the content uploaded by the users and of not being in a
position to control the same, the spokesman continued. Through its
injunctions the District Court in Cologne had now however made it
clear to the company that the fact that it was the users and not the
operator of the services that uploaded the content onto the sites did
not, from a legal point of view, lessen the operator¢€™s liability for
copyright infringements that occurred within the context of the
services, the spokesman added.
Harald Heker, the chairman of the executive board of GEMA, believes
the court's decisions will have repercussions on the way "Web 2.0
services" such as YouTube and MySpace will be treated in future. What
the decisions according to Mr. Heker show is that "the mere
circumstance of shifting acts of use to users and the purported
inability of the operator to control content do not relieve the
operator of a service from the copyright liability he/she/it possesses
for the content made available for download from the operator's
website(s)." (Robert W. Smith) / (anw/c't)