Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:35 am
by deepdiver32073
I heard on NPR yesterday that the FDA is looking at the possibility of re-writing the acceptable definition of chocolate. For those of you who don't know, Chocolate is defined currently as a mixture of cocoa butter, cocoa powder and sugar. There can be other ingredients in it (emulsifiers, preservatives, milk, almonds, etc), but the main ingredients must be those 3. The FDA is looking into allowing types of hydrogenated vegetable oils to be substituted partially or wholly for the cocoa butter. Does anyone remember trying to eat one of those Easter Bunnies that could sit on your dashboard on a Summer's day in Florida and not melt? That's the kind of "Chocolate" they want to be able to call "Chocolate". Now it's called "chocolate flavored" or something like that.
Are there any other chocoholics out there that are just as incensed about this as I am? Would you eat what they mass produce or would you go out and find "gourmet" chocolate that's made the way it's supposed to be?
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:07 am
by smartass_06
gourmet all the way
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 2:04 am
by g00b3r
Would Hershey's do the same?
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:01 am
by deepdiver32073
It's quite possible the major chocolate manufacturers would alter their process. While some would not, there's no way short of reading the label to tell before you take a bite (then, I'd bet you'd know).
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 1:50 am
by Adtz
This is basically a blasphemous act on the part of the US government. It's one thing to start wars, violate human rights, or otherwise ignore the Constitution. I'm fine with that.
But messing with Chocolate?! It's time to march on Washington!
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 2:22 am
by gmsnctry
and make sure they're supposed to be green....
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 3:29 am
by g00b3r
I think I have made it obvious in other topics that I don't um, read the labels. lol
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 4:35 pm
by SAMIYAM
...damned government won't be satisfied till they've totally fucked up everything worth living for...
Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 8:01 pm
by Lost Ghost
lmao adtz...
I personally don't eat chocolate so it wouldn't matter to me....but what's the point in the FDA doing this?
Would it be cheaper to produce?
What's their motive?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:17 am
by deepdiver32073
From what I understand, a large part of the food distribution network wants the change (not so much the chocolate industry) mostly like the grocers and distributors. What their motive is I can't understand. WTF should they care if it's "chocolate" or "chocolate flavored" when they're stocking it?