Page 1 of 3

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 7:22 pm
by AYHJA
In response to this article: http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/67 ... &GT1=10035

Truth of the matter is, I'm not sure, and moreover, the way it hurts it is probably the way it helps it...If you think about it, most of the demographic that watches and participates in sports is male...Males that like sports tend to like hot chicks...Not exactly science...I mean, if there was a poll about which female sports your would like to watch, Volleyball and Tennis would probably take 85% of the votes...I, for example, would not want to watch chicks play football...

Candace Parker is amazing...As a player and a female...I can't so for sure that I'm watching for one or the other, but I know for damn sure I'm affected that I think she's pretty...

The girl, Amanda Beard, I don't see how she's hurting the sport...If anything, she's doing the sport a favor by posing, cause whereas I wouldn't have given 2 shits about her before, I'll definitely be checking now...Through Playboy, she may have easily scored a million fans...A hot fit, chick dripping wet..? I'll be on time for that...

Your thoughts..?

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:27 pm
by raum
finally!!! a thread in sports i can hit up...

Women posing nude does not hurt ANYTHING.

nuff said!

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 9:15 pm
by Deepak
lol @ raum. But I totally agree.

There is no way this could hurt the sport infact it will make it more popular and make people more aware of the sports that dont happen right on their door step.

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 11:20 pm
by deepdiver32073
How does increasing the fan base hurt a sport? Puhleeze!

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 11:56 pm
by gmsnctry
Smokin Hot, Wet and Nekkid Athletic Women..... Hell that's the Best Damn Sport Period

Sex Sells Baby!!!!

I'll be there

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:56 am
by jdog
Some athletic women shouldn't pose nude. Playboy will be using quite a bit of Photoshop with this chick.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 3:54 am
by AYHJA


Hmm...Like I said..? I'll be ON TIME for that...

That's Beard on the left...Don't let them swimming shots fool you homie, she can doll...They'll offer her as much airbrushing as they do other girls...I'd actually prefer to see her, cause I know what she looks like w/o...The Playboy pics are liable to be awesome...


Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:33 pm
by deepdiver32073
damn straight! With or without airbrushing, but like you, I think her natural beauty won't need much.

Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 4:09 pm
by jdog
QUOTE(Ĺ“bermensch @ May 11 2007, 11:54 PM)

Hmm...Like I said..? I'll be ON TIME for that...

That's Beard on the left...Don't let them swimming shots fool you homie, she can doll...They'll offer her as much airbrushing as they do other girls...I'd actually prefer to see her, cause I know what she looks like w/o...The Playboy pics are liable to be awesome...



She looks good in the swimsuit pic but the Speedo is obviously airbrushed.

That girl in the blue swimsuit is what I'm talking about. I do not want to see her naked at all. There's nothing attractive about a man with a pussy.

Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 4:41 am
by gmsnctry






One reason I actually pay attention to women's swimming. She could toss my ass outta bed in the morning, make me get her breakfast, then throw me out and I'd still walk home with a smile on my face; photoshopped or not she's HOTT

and they better do the shoot like the 'Girls of AVP' not that Artsy Fartsy SHIT like K Witt, D Hannah and G Reese