Page 1 of 1
Digital SLR
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:41 pm
by AYHJA
Does anybody here own one, or know one intimately enough to vouch for one..? I have a Canon Rebel SLR now, but its film...It's awesome, but I think that I want to go digital for a little while...I realize that some of these cameras can cost a pretty penny, shit I think my Rebel was about $200 8 years ago...
Its time for me to start getting ready for volleyball season... :D
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 8:09 pm
by Dubbler2002
I have a Olympus E-330 DSLR. A couple of years old but works great.
used to have a Yashica FX-3 35mm, but now that I've gone digital I won't go back.
They have gotten so much better then when they first came out.
The Rebel DSLR are supposed to be very good and I think you can use you old lenses with them (not 100% sure). The Nikon D-200 I've used a little and it's even better than my Olympus.
The new Olympus E-410 and E-510 offer the feature of using the lcd instead of the view finder. The first DSLR's to do so.
If you go with Nikon, Canon, Olympus. You should be very happy.
Just have your check book out.
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 9:18 pm
by AYHJA
What are you shooting mostly..? I'm definitely getting a camera next year, and some binoculars too...One of my three must haves for the year...
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 12:41 pm
by raum
Canon Rebel XT, for the money, is one of the best digital SLR's I have ever put hand on. and I usually am not a fan of Canon, but this is a happy exception we have used since 2005, when babe got hers.
That and the sony handycam keeps us good for the good times!
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:11 am
by deepsepia
If money is a concern, don't go the DSLR route-- get a Canon G9 or equivalent. Cheaper, easier to handle, and the image quality is astonishing. SLRs were developed for film, and while at the very high end there still is some optical superiority that matters -- particularly if you're going out to print-- if you're going to be viewing this stuff on a monitor, a first rate compact is going to give you everything you want.
Here's a review from a serious "snob" site called
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/revie ... apan.shtml
and another from DPreview
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong9/
Is is "as good" as a DSLR? Nope, not quite. But its
nearly as good, less expensive, and you're much more likely to have it with you when a good shot comes up
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:51 pm
by Skinny Bastard
If you stick with the cannon - you can have interchangable lenses.....
...nothing wrong with being a little practical
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:41 pm
by AYHJA
Yeah, and I already have a Canon w/a couple lenses, so I'll probably definitely stick with it...
Hopefully will get it around my birthday this year if not before...
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:12 pm
by Skinny Bastard
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:25 am
by AYHJA
Ahh, those are great...I've always liked Canon, my Grannie shot with a Cannon some 40 years ago, so I never really thought about another brand...But I trust you guys here, so listening to some other POV's was definitely mandatory...Nice to know AF is always here to help...Thanks guys...
Re: Digital SLR
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:57 pm
by Skinny Bastard
so now that I have a Rebel XSi, any good "digital photography for dummies" books out there?