Americans coming to their senses?

News, politics, economy, local and global information, geography, life, living, and travel forum.

0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

Bot
Posts: 4503
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:38 pm

Americans coming to their senses?

#1

Post by Bot »

As if 50% agree... lol


Poll finds U.S. split over eavesdropping

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
AYHJA
392
Posts: 37990
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

#2

Post by AYHJA »

Am I the only one that thinks...That because of the simple fact they ARE discussing it...Means that they are already doing it..?

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
deepdiver32073
Iconoclast Extraordinaire
Posts: 8395
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:25 pm

#3

Post by deepdiver32073 »

Dude... they've been doing it for YEARS... ever since your Dubya got the Patriot Act passed. "President Bush has defended signing secret orders allowing the National Security Agency to intercept international communications..." "Bush acknowledged signing the orders after the program was first reported in The New York Times, sparking criticism across the political gamut." "The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 states that the special court must approve any eavesdropping on U.S. citizens on American soil."

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
Bot
Posts: 4503
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:38 pm

#4

Post by Bot »

And the amazing thing is that 50% of respondents side with Bush. I figured the number would be extremely low, somewhere in the single digits. lol

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
deepdiver32073
Iconoclast Extraordinaire
Posts: 8395
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:25 pm

#5

Post by deepdiver32073 »

I KNOW!!! My God, has no one read the Constitution?

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

#6

Post by raum »

there is no right to privacy from government in the constitution.

in fact, just the opposite. There is a duty to open discolure to your representative governments.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
deepdiver32073
Iconoclast Extraordinaire
Posts: 8395
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:25 pm

#7

Post by deepdiver32073 »

I beg to differ:


Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

#8

Post by raum »

See, the Bill of Rights guarantees it, but not the Constitution. America's genuine policy on such privacy, was as a Democracy of Open Disclosure, privacy could only serve to convolute the integrity of Congressional view of Public Opinion.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
deepdiver32073
Iconoclast Extraordinaire
Posts: 8395
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:25 pm

#9

Post by deepdiver32073 »

I consider the Bill of Rights to be part of the Constitution since the Constitution was not ratified without it.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

#10

Post by raum »

I consider it the first evidence of privateering, which has become an american way.

so, oh well.

you get what you invoke, yeah?

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
Post Reply