Men more likely than women to support wars

Bot · #1

What does everyone else think? It is true? lol

Researchers identify 'male warrior effect'

http://edition.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/resul ... clude.html

#2

Oh yea, I totally think it's true. Men are more of the "let's take this outside and fight like men" and women are more of the diplomatic type. It's just the way we're made

#3

Of course it's true. Women never like violence.

#4

Men are natural hunters and women are natural gatherers. We fight to solve problems, they talk them out. Women think there is ALWAYS a way to solve a problem without using violance, men think the name calling IS talking it out.

#5

and still... if you put too many women together, they are more likely to not agree than men. totally confuses me.

yet it does not surprise me at all.

#6

You put too many women together and a damn fight is liable to break out. Always bitching about SOMETHING.

#7

This is based on an "International Relations" theory is often cited by feminist writers. I think there is some validity to the issue but it has refuted since many women leaders have been just as war-prone as men.

#8

Unless the battle is against cheating husbands, I dont see why this wouldnt be true..

#9

They support wars because they're more likely to fight in them.

Why?

Men have more sexual freedom while at war. That's why they can cope.
(at least according to John Heller, or whatever the name of the bloke who wrote Catch 22).

I personally don't support wars. I have very aggressive violent tendencies, but I still would rather resolve things diplomatic. I don't give a flying fuck if my index finger is longer relative to my ring finger which is indicative of being exposed to more oestrogen while in the womb- you got somethin' to say back step outside and get yer face rearranged!!!
lol