QUOTE(Aemeth @ Nov 18 2006, 04:22 PM) Well shit, I miss a few days and I have no idea what's going on...(I have read everything tho lol)
I would like x to explain the "nothing to something" theory he believes in if it isn't too much trouble...Just because I have yet to hear a credible one...
Aemeth,
Think of it more as a "Nothing: to a PERCEPTION of Something"
You think that is air that you are breathing..?
A Case for Intelligent Design by an Enemy of Tyranny.
-
x3n
- Posts: 1177
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:22 pm
A "credible one"?
You mean something far apart from a "god" creating everything OUT OF NOTHING as well? Are you sure you can discern what a credible theory is?. It seems the basic difference in your views is that "god wills it so", that's not a theory, that's blind faith. Out of nothing works only if god is in the equation, otherwise...it requires evidence, or proof? don't you think you should probably provide it for its existence first?
We were discussing the essence of all that we perceive, which according to both science AND ancient scriptures, is in fact, the same "every-where". Where we seem to diverge is in the concept of intent, of will. Where man assigns human qualities to the immaterial.
You mean something far apart from a "god" creating everything OUT OF NOTHING as well? Are you sure you can discern what a credible theory is?. It seems the basic difference in your views is that "god wills it so", that's not a theory, that's blind faith. Out of nothing works only if god is in the equation, otherwise...it requires evidence, or proof? don't you think you should probably provide it for its existence first?
We were discussing the essence of all that we perceive, which according to both science AND ancient scriptures, is in fact, the same "every-where". Where we seem to diverge is in the concept of intent, of will. Where man assigns human qualities to the immaterial.
Dude, of course she's gonna dig it...your mom loves the cock
| BBcode: | |
| Hide post links |