Death of Officer 40 Years After Shooting May Bring New Charg

[Buffmaster]

Death of Officer 40 Years After Shooting May Bring New Charges for Gunman

Wednesday, August 22, 2007



PHILADELPHIA — A Philadelphia policeman shot while on duty four decades ago died of his injuries this week, raising the possibility of a homicide charge against a man who already served a prison sentence for the shooting, authorities said.

Walter T. Barclay, a rookie officer, was gunned down Nov. 27, 1966, while trying to stop the burglary of a beauty shop in the city's East Oak Lane section. Barclay, who was left a paraplegic, died Sunday at age 64.

William J. Barnes, now 71, was sentenced to a 10- to 20-year term in the shooting.

Chief Inspector of Detectives Joseph Fox said Tuesday that the Bucks County coroner had ruled Barclay's death a homicide stemming from complications from the shooting. Police are talking with prosecutors to decide whether Barnes should now be charged with murder in the case, he said.

The District Attorney's Office issued a short statement Tuesday, saying only, "We intend to review all of the evidence before making a decision in this case." Prosecutors would not elaborate.

Lawyers asked about the case said prosecutors would be on solid legal ground to charge Barnes, but that proving the case would be challenging.

"Complications from a shooting 30 or 40 years ago don't take 30 or 40 years to surface," said Jeffrey Lindy, a former federal prosecutor now working as a defense lawyer. "A medical expert could say it could be from this or it could be from that."

Barclay's sister, Rosalyn Harrison, said her brother suffered "horribly" after the shooting.

"You have no idea what a hard time he had," she said.

[raum]

the shooter did his time, which perhaps too light a sentence for crippling a young police officer and making his life hell until he died...

I have to uphold the notion that if the shooter did his jury and court appointed time, and was released and maintained a legal and civil standing, he has paid his due.

My condolences to Officer Barclay's family, but imprisoning a man AGAIN for a crime he has punished for serves no ideal of this country, or the Judicial branch of our government.

and the precedent that would set for further "reconvictions" would just be an ultimate detriment to the individuals who do attempt to rehabilitate.