Political use of not-for-profit funds.

News, politics, economy, local and global information, geography, life, living, and travel forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

Political use of not-for-profit funds.

#1

Post by raum »

Pull the funding on NOW (National Organization of Women)- they are not-for-profit and expressing a political view on a candidate, not an issue. CHANGE runs both ways.

http://www.now.org/press/08-08/08-29.html

Not Every Woman Supports Women's Rights

August 29, 2008
Statement of NOW PAC Chair Kim Gandy on the Selection of Sarah Palin as John McCain's Vice Presidential Pick

Sen. John McCain's choice of Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his running mate is a cynical effort to appeal to disappointed Hillary Clinton voters and get them to vote, ultimately, against their own self-interest.

Gov. Palin may be the second woman vice-presidential candidate on a major party ticket, but she is not the right woman. Sadly, she is a woman who opposes women's rights, just like John McCain.

The fact that Palin is a mother of five who has a 4-month-old baby, a woman who is juggling work and family responsibilities, will speak to many women. But will Palin speak FOR women? Based on her record and her stated positions, the answer is clearly No.

In a gubernatorial debate, Palin stated emphatically that her opposition to abortion was so great, so total, that even if her teenage daughter was impregnated by a rapist, she would "choose life" -- meaning apparently that she would not permit her daughter to have an abortion.

Palin also had to withdraw her appointment of a top public safety commissioner who had been reprimanded for sexual harassment, although Palin had been warned about his background through letters by the sexual harassment complainant.

What McCain does not understand is that women supported Hillary Clinton not just because she was a woman, but because she was a champion on their issues. They will surely not find Sarah Palin to be an advocate for women.

Sen. Joe Biden is the VP candidate who appeals to women, with his authorship and championing of landmark domestic violence legislation, support for pay equity, and advocacy for women around the world.

Finally, as the chair of NOW's Political Action Committee, I am frequently asked whether NOW supports women candidates just because they are women. This gives me an opportunity to once again answer that question with an emphatic 'No.' We recognize the importance of having women's rights supporters at every level but, like Sarah Palin, not every woman supports women's rights.

###

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
AYHJA
392
Posts: 37990
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

Re: Political use of not-for-profit funds.

#2

Post by AYHJA »

Hmm, when they say, 'Expressing a political view' I'm not so sure this falls under that category...Maybe she simply pointed out what happened..? There's that one line about her being the right woman, but the majority of the spill seems aimed at Palin for things she's said related to things important to female activists...

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

Re: Political use of not-for-profit funds.

#3

Post by raum »

The problem is her record doesn't actually speak of regulated action against abortion, or funding protests and action against abortionists. She just basically "morally disproves of it."

And they openly endorse Biden. That is illegal.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
Post Reply