palin never once tried to do anything like that. she cut funds for anti-abortionists, increased funds for pregnant women and teens, and believes in the use and instruction of contraceptives.blixa wrote:personaly I think in the end Mccain isnt the Maverick he says he is and America will probably be "short changed" by Obama
Palin won't end up being able to "ban abortion" or make "everyone go to church" and Biden will just be your same ole' democrat
I have never used the M...k word. I am not a mcainiac. In fact, I was the first person to criticize him on this forum, including questioning his military image promoted by others. I generally don't like "neo-con". I do stand with him, and Obama, on many issues though. Then again they stand together on many issues as well.In a widely quoted 2006 survey she answered during her gubernatorial campaign, Palin said she supported abstinence-until-marriage programs. But weeks later, she proclaimed herself "pro-contraception" and said condoms ought to be discussed in schools alongside abstinence.
"I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues," she said during a debate in Juneau.
Obama is a socialist. I dislike socialism, prolly because I am fiercely independent. shrug, maybe some people need it. I am so anti-socialist that I oppose the Pledge of Allegiance, and i expressed that here as well.what do you guys feel seperates the two
Biden presiding over a democrat congress which has the worst congressional record ever introducing bills to a socialist president is a really BAD idea.
McCain seems to have a good VP selection. If she can stay as clean and directed as her past. I secretly hope she goes apeshit on the whole system and we are left with the need to create a govt as simple as the core values that she uses to stir up Republican angst in Alaska govt. she does not vote abortion issues into alaska.
McCain himself is a neo-con. Despite that He has some good ideas, but I need to see even more FEDERAL conservatism. (like Ben Franklin was my man!!! Screw all these new people.)
as a data analyst who works with financial information systems and energy industry risk management systems, I only trust my own analysis of raw data. i see wrong reports all the time from companies and govt. agencies.I mean you can argue economics but you can't really judge that untill they have had a few years in oriffice
at this time, both candidates see a future with at least a minimal military presence in iraq until 2010, and maybe even 2025. this is really a non-issue. it is a globalism country building effort that i don't support being promoted as a war. I have well documented my position on how something has to be done, but if we are going to go to war, let's not pretend. wat should be atrocious terrible and quick; and seldom, if ever, employed with no reservation.for me it's been the stance on the Iraq war/Invasion that really seperates them...
but both of these men are conditioned for tolerance of sectarian violence by their partisan nature.... though alot of their views are very similarly unconstitutional. but some of those common views are not constitutional but are sound judgements that religious regression must not be allowed to interfere with. Just like both opposed same sex marriage, and both vote stem cells. The major issues are funding efforts for social programs that have yet to prove they EVER work, and more recently partial birth abortion. both vote pretty much the same on alot of other issues.
