^^
Bud...Both you and Kant are ill if you believe that...Repeat what you just said, and then read the question again...
We need both mind and ears to INTERPRET sound
vs
If a tree falls in the woods does it still MAKE a sound
Next..!
Time: Only In Our Minds?
-
AYHJA
- 392
- Posts: 37990
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
- Contact:
-
raum
- Posts: 3944
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am
finally, d put in a question to answer.
Time, as you have learned it, plainly put, is a hypothesis, and nothing more.
it works as well as the bohr model of the atom,.. even though the highest forms of science demand that there is no such things as electrons.
String theory, Synchronicity, and even Mendelbrot Sets and Julian Strains are not possible given what we experience as temporal perception.
Entropy,.. don't even go there. :-$
time exists outside our minds,.. but our perceptions of time originate in the mind. We have standardized our measurements of times to make up for the fact that our perceptions of it can not be identical.
The only way to really approach it outside of your mind is to "leave" your "mind" behind; if only momentarily. ](*,) and you can't force it to happen.
As far as Kant,. his main flaw was he based his philosophy on mind, not life. His idea of time includes unfailable destiny, and predeterminism is one of the biggest loads of bunk you can sell in the game of philosophy.
vertical,
Raum
Time, as you have learned it, plainly put, is a hypothesis, and nothing more.
it works as well as the bohr model of the atom,.. even though the highest forms of science demand that there is no such things as electrons.
String theory, Synchronicity, and even Mendelbrot Sets and Julian Strains are not possible given what we experience as temporal perception.
Entropy,.. don't even go there. :-$
time exists outside our minds,.. but our perceptions of time originate in the mind. We have standardized our measurements of times to make up for the fact that our perceptions of it can not be identical.
The only way to really approach it outside of your mind is to "leave" your "mind" behind; if only momentarily. ](*,) and you can't force it to happen.
As far as Kant,. his main flaw was he based his philosophy on mind, not life. His idea of time includes unfailable destiny, and predeterminism is one of the biggest loads of bunk you can sell in the game of philosophy.
vertical,
Raum
| BBcode: | |
| Hide post links |
-
trashtalkr
- Sports Guru
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:20 pm
- Contact:
Wow..this is deep....
"If there were no eternal consciousness in a man, if at the bottom of everything there were only a wild ferment, a power that twisting in dark passions produced everything great or inconsequential; if an unfathomable insatiable emptiness lay hid beneath everything, what would life be but despair?"
Soren Kierkegaard
Soren Kierkegaard
| BBcode: | |
| Hide post links |
-
capnstick
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 9:14 pm