Plug it in, plug it in...

Talk about and discuss various advancements and achievents in the arts and sciences of invention and modification; computers, sciences, mathematics, and technology for all.
Post Reply

0
No votes
 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
raum
Posts: 3944
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:51 am

Plug it in, plug it in...

#1

Post by raum »


BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
AYHJA
392
Posts: 37990
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

#2

Post by AYHJA »

Oh wow..! Now that's sweet..!

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
fatboy42
Posts: 279
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:14 am

#3

Post by fatboy42 »

That is pretty cool.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
emanon
Posts: 2122
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 3:46 pm

#4

Post by emanon »

does sound cool. I wonder what all this "special chip" does.
seems like this should have been available a long time ago.

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
WAY
Site Admin
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:43 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

#5

Post by WAY »

Sounds like a great idea, and useful in the short term, however, I doubt we will see it being used in every single home with more than 1 computer, seeing as the max data transfer rate is 170MBits a second.. Ethernet currently maxes out 1000MBits a second (and I got that at home, w00t!)..
Also, is 170MB/s theoretical, or real-life transfer rate?

For internet sharing, probably your best bet for quite a number of years, but for sharing files and LAN games, stick with ethernet, if you require fast LAN connection rates for games/applications, or transfering large files (GB's of data)..

Or if you can, install fibre optic cabling in your house: you won't need to fix up your wiring for a LONG time.. /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />

Example of Usage:

Internet at 28MBits/sec
Test Movie File: 2.57GB

Cat4 LAN (16MBits/s): Internet: 16MBits/sec (theoretical) (speed loss of 12MBits/sec)
Cat4 LAN (16MBits/s): Data: would take 4:23 to transfer (theorectial)

Cat5 LAN (100MBits/s): Internet: 28MBits/sec (no speed loss)
Cat5 LAN (100MBits/s): Data: would take 25sec to transfer (theorectial)
Note: Cat5E is faster than Cat5, but slower than Cat6

New Chip (170MBits/s): Internet: 28MBits/sec (no speed loss)
New Chip (170MBits/s): Data: would take 15sec to transfer (theorectial)

Cat6 LAN (100MBits/s): Internet: 28MBits/sec (no speed loss)
Cat6 LAN (100MBits/s): Data: would take 2sec to transfer (theorectial)

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
User avatar
AYHJA
392
Posts: 37990
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
Location: Washington, D.C.
Contact:

#6

Post by AYHJA »

From what I read, it was faster than Ethernet...

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
WAY
Site Admin
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:43 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

#7

Post by WAY »

QUOTE(TheCabin.net)The technology has been around for some time †™ ¢‚¬„¢¢‚¬Å¡‚¢†™‚¢‚¢¢¢‚¬Å¡‚¬¦‚¡¢‚¬Å¡‚¬†™‚¢‚¢¢¢¬…¡‚¬? including in the United States †™ ¢‚¬„¢¢‚¬Å¡‚¢†™‚¢‚¢¢¢‚¬Å¡‚¬¦‚¡¢‚¬Å¡‚¬†™‚¢‚¢¢¢¬…¡‚¬? but Matsushita's system is unique in that it delivers fast-speed broadband information at up to 170 megabits per second, which is faster than Ethernet.

Interesting claim, but my computer says my ethernet is faster..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_ethernet
(also - I just learnt that there is also 10 Gigabit Ethernet - check the link at the bottom of the article)

BBcode:
Hide post links
Show post links
Post Reply