Are we alone?
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:39 pm
In a supposedly infinite universe it would be rather selfish of us to think we are the only planet with life.
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
- trashtalkr
- Sports Guru
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 8:20 pm
- Contact:
I think that we are the only intelligent life out there. I don't have time to post all the info about it know, but the complexity of Earth and how it's positioned excatly right and the right atmosphere and everything for life, it would be pretty impossible to recreate that for another form of life
"If there were no eternal consciousness in a man, if at the bottom of everything there were only a wild ferment, a power that twisting in dark passions produced everything great or inconsequential; if an unfathomable insatiable emptiness lay hid beneath everything, what would life be but despair?"
Soren Kierkegaard
Soren Kierkegaard
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
- AYHJA
- 392
- Posts: 37990
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:43 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Another un-understandable post by TT.. /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />
However, if you do read it a couple times it makes sense..
My stance on the subject..? No, I don't think we are the only living organisms in space. Not just large things like humans, but micro-bio-organisms are more than likely to be on a planet other than earth. I'm pretty sure they actually found a metor with some in the rock. But, the life that's out there is either way behind us (not being able to travel into space at all, very little, or just not beleive in other life), at our approximate speed (about the same amount of general information about space and transport to other planets), or much further in front of us (seen us previously and not thought of us as very interlectual at the time, or maybe they created the earth, where I'd reference the book 'The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy', oh, and don't see the movie, it's shit, go read some books your weirdos) [note that this cannot be correct since time travel into the past is impossible - well, that's my theory anyway].
You also have to take into account the high possibility of alternate and mirror universes (aka parallel dimensions), where there can also be more than one of each.
Sounds interesting, eh..?
[edit]Names are all fixed now.. and the asshat avvy is back..! [/edit]
However, if you do read it a couple times it makes sense..
My stance on the subject..? No, I don't think we are the only living organisms in space. Not just large things like humans, but micro-bio-organisms are more than likely to be on a planet other than earth. I'm pretty sure they actually found a metor with some in the rock. But, the life that's out there is either way behind us (not being able to travel into space at all, very little, or just not beleive in other life), at our approximate speed (about the same amount of general information about space and transport to other planets), or much further in front of us (seen us previously and not thought of us as very interlectual at the time, or maybe they created the earth, where I'd reference the book 'The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy', oh, and don't see the movie, it's shit, go read some books your weirdos) [note that this cannot be correct since time travel into the past is impossible - well, that's my theory anyway].
You also have to take into account the high possibility of alternate and mirror universes (aka parallel dimensions), where there can also be more than one of each.
Sounds interesting, eh..?
[edit]Names are all fixed now.. and the asshat avvy is back..! [/edit]
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
-
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:37 am
TT....all the atmosphere and shit is perfectly right for humans.........what about the bacteria that lives in glaciers?
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
-
- Posts: 3607
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 8:37 am
QUOTE(raum)LG,
Do you care to try and prove I have no evidence of God's existence?
because I'm in the majority on this forum, which is people who don't have proof that God exsists....it would make more sense for you to prove to me...and others...of your evidence....rather than me try and prove that you dont..
Do you care to try and prove I have no evidence of God's existence?
because I'm in the majority on this forum, which is people who don't have proof that God exsists....it would make more sense for you to prove to me...and others...of your evidence....rather than me try and prove that you dont..
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:43 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
But that, in itself, is a completely different topic..
It's called Science vs Religion, and it's been going on for ages..
It's called Science vs Religion, and it's been going on for ages..
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
- AYHJA
- 392
- Posts: 37990
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
- Contact:
The existence of God has nothing to do with religion...
And LG...Before you duck outta the topic...Let us be reminded that it was you who so boldly claimed that God did not exist...So, explain yourself if you can...I'm interested to see which or what God you refute...
And LG...Before you duck outta the topic...Let us be reminded that it was you who so boldly claimed that God did not exist...So, explain yourself if you can...I'm interested to see which or what God you refute...
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
- deepdiver32073
- Iconoclast Extraordinaire
- Posts: 8395
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:25 pm
QUOTE(who.am.i)Another un-understandable post by DD.. /:D" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt=":D" />
However, if you do read it a couple times it makes sense..
WTF?!? I haven't posted in this until now. And I like to think (and have had no indication otherwise that my posts are generally understandable).
With that being said, I believe just statistically speaking, the odds of life elsewhere in the universe being damn good. The number of star systems that are available for such life, whatever form it may take, is so huge it boggles the mind. And while there is no definite proof of life in other parts of the universe, there are indicators that it has both existed in the past and may exist presently.
However, if you do read it a couple times it makes sense..
WTF?!? I haven't posted in this until now. And I like to think (and have had no indication otherwise that my posts are generally understandable).
With that being said, I believe just statistically speaking, the odds of life elsewhere in the universe being damn good. The number of star systems that are available for such life, whatever form it may take, is so huge it boggles the mind. And while there is no definite proof of life in other parts of the universe, there are indicators that it has both existed in the past and may exist presently.
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |
- AYHJA
- 392
- Posts: 37990
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:25 pm
- Location: Washington, D.C.
- Contact:
Heh...I think he meant "TT"...
Funny who., I don't remember when the forum voted in favor of you removing teh asshat....... :-k
Funny who., I don't remember when the forum voted in favor of you removing teh asshat....... :-k
BBcode: | |
Hide post links |