Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:34 am
by trashtalkr
It might just be intuition. That's how I would explain it probably. I don't know much about this all...that's why I'm basically staying out of this thread.
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:46 am
by Lost Ghost
Yeah, I tend to stray away from here because I'm so uneducated on everything dicussed, but I've felt strangely about that for a while, then when my girls asks how did you learn to do this and that, and I'm like....I just kinda knew...and she calls bullshit, but I have no other like...explaination for it, so I'm just searching for some answers.
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:18 am
by raum
the answers are there, and you are on the right track...
but i have a question for you;
Do you have to be the artist of a cd, to know all the lyrics to all the songs, or just to own the piece of music?
or do you just have to listen to alot of music, and know where to get it?
vertical(?)
raum
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 4:42 pm
by Pete
You certainly understand it better if you created the music yourself.
But I understand music quite well, of which I didn't create myself. (but alot of that understanding is because of how I relate to the songs).
Unless you are Bob Dylan, who smoked so much marijuana when he wrote his songs, he had to ask his friends what they were about, because he forgot and was too drugged to remember.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 3:26 am
by Lost Ghost
You don't have to be the artist to know them, but to completely understand each and every one, I think you do.
Any further questions your royalty? (not sarcastic)
**Edit** Pete....take your posts elsewhere please.
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:15 pm
by raum
LG,
I am talking about the "Akashic Library"... look it up.
It is the concentrated total of the information in the Collective consciousness of humanity, and some people have more than a little access to it.
Maybe books would have been a better anology,.. but look it up, and see what you think... sound familiar?
vertical,
raum
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:43 pm
by x3n
I'm still not clear on whether we refer to the Astral plane as a level, or whether it encompasses the different level of this coming existence. Flying during a dreamstate or the vertigo resulting in jolt when you wake is said to be your "Astral body" experiencing its separation from its current home. But as I understand it, this is still "far" (so to speak) from other "higher" levels of the spiritual realms.
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:40 pm
by raum
The Astral never really go a good definition, in here.
and i am not sure it canwithout huge huge vocabulary lists, and awkward anologies. the astral must be understood in as being a nonphysical plane, which is on its lowest levels is just an intangible interaction with our "physical" realm (a means by which the "presence" of a person is communicated to a place, and condition, and the ability to focus is comparable to the physical senses). As you proceed *outward* from a base representation of the "real world", so does it begin to become more "ambiguous," most tradional speculation is that it is because the energy of the sun bounceing back (and yada yada) causes currents which creat conditions one can manipulate, RIDE, and anticipate with certain practices...
does this help?
if not, i will come and yank ya out and watch ya try and claw your way across the ceiling. ](*,) that's how it started for me back when i was nine.
vertical,
raum
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:34 pm
by x3n
so RAUM, would you say it makes more sense (and this is, of course, the "cliff notes" version, if you will), to understand the Astral plane as the whole non-physical realm?, rather than just the lower level?