Mathmatical Proof Of God's Existence

#1

Ight, I've heard some talk of this theory, but havent seen it..

Wanna give it a go, raum?

#2

I've heard about this also. All I know is that it has to do with the mathimatical number 'e'

#3

#4

Ok,let's begin with the main problem.

It is not mathematical proof of God's existence.

It is a mathematical proof that states God exists.

I have no time to explain this, and am not sure how much you know about Mathematics, but you can start finding more about this by looking up and reading about George Cantor, Renes Decartes, and any use of the word "Cartesian" in relation to mathematics. All of this is solid research that will give you enough knowledge to understand the equation, and proof..

The Short answer is George Hammond a solid state physicist was studying Psychometry, and fell upon it by accident after 20 years of research.

He was studying a model of psychology architecture, as originally found in an ancient Qabalistic text and mirrored in the Alchemical process, that attributes the model of the Human psyche to a cube. This is a respectable physicist using a respectable method to produce a erratic conclusion.

All of this was regarded by his fellow peers, and they thought it was very clever, and praised him for his wit. The truth is, anything looks good on paper. His work in photochemistry is still regarded as one of the most significant achievements since the established laws of thermodynamics in Columbia University and Caltech, where jhe led extensive research teams.

His work is published here, http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com...georgefile.html

I guess i'm a sucker for "plz" heh #-o
vertical,
raum

#5

yeah, im lost.

#6

td,

it's not really worth it to try and figure it out.

it makes no sense to study in depth such an abstract proof, when there is so much other stuff of real value to focus on.

my own opinion.

No one will believe this proof's claim. It will not change one skeptic's views. It has no intrinsic power, to mathematically prove god's existence; for God is an essence, not an existence.

I put the much into putting it here, simply because Deej said "plz."

I'd rather waste the brain cells used to answer this post drinking a beer with my girl and watching cartoons late at night.

vertical,
raum

#7

QUOTE(adiriel) Â for God is an essence, not an existence.

there we go...

now THAT...makes sense.

#8

thank you :-)

#9

Thanks for posting the link. Yes, it hasn't changed my views, but it was interesting to read. I think it's a bit abstract, relating all that just out of some equation etc. At first I thought it was gonna say God was at O on the cartesian diagram, the origin, at the middle of the x, y and z axes.

I know this is saying it lightly, but overall I reckon when you believe in God, really you are believing in yourself. It is common for people to have something to look up to, to have a representative, something to live for and believe in, as they don't think they can believe in themselves, and doubt themselves. That is why there is this essence. The Son (Jesus Christ) is the manifestion, the Father is the essence. The Holy Spirit, I don't know what to call but, but it's part of it.

Oh, I am writing about this because I've just finished celebrating Orthodox Easter (and imaging what it'd be like playing Mercyful Fate in a church). Fasting heavily for the last few days (towards the end I ate some Saos with tomato and gherkins, then 24 hours later ate one carrot, then 24 hours later, after the Resurrection service at church, ate a whole box of chocolate TeeVee snacks, then a bowl of chicken soup, then 12 hours later at a easter Sunday picnic several souvlakia and some barbecued lamb riblets, and 9 hours ago some Indian Spiced Chicken (gotta stock back up on meat!) which I cooked).

#10

I am sorry for going off on a tangent like that. It's just that my eating habits have gone out of whack, and right now I am VERY tired but can't get to sleep, it is 3am.

Again, I apologise.